Parties and the Virtual Campaign : The 2005 Election

نویسندگان

  • Stephen Ward
  • Rachel Gibson
چکیده

Introduction By the time of the 2005 general election, most UK parties had been running websites and using online campaign tools for a decade or more. This was the third general election campaign in which the internet, World Wide Web (WWW) and email had played a role, but the first one where the majority of the UK electorate now had access. 1 Whilst the initial hype surrounding the democratising potential of the internet may have subsided, expectations were again raised that the net could play a crucial role in the election. Such expectations had been fostered both by technological and political developments. Since 2001, broadband connections and also use of mobile phone technology had expanded rapidly. Politically, high profile online campaigns developed in the 2004 US presidential election, notably the Howard Dean phenomena. Yet, the 2005 online campaign barely registered with the media and much of the virtual election, at least superficially, appeared to mirror the election generally-much activity, but little real change. In this paper, therefore, we examine the parties' 2005 online campaigns and place them in the context of our earlier We analyse how far party competition has become normalised on the web; whether new technologies are introducing new campaigning techniques and accelerating the existing professionalisation of electioneering; and finally, what sort of audience there is for online communication. Can the net attract the interest of parts of the electorate not reached by traditional communication routes or, does it merely reinforce existing gaps in electoral participation?

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

CENTRO DE INVESTIGACIÓN ECONÓMICA Discussion Paper Series Policy Platforms , Campaign Spending and Voter Participation

We model electoral competition between two parties in a winner-take-all election. Parties choose strategically first their platforms and then their campaign spending under aggregate uncertainty about voters’ preferences. We use the model to examine why campaign spending in the United States has increased at the same time that politics has become more polarized. We find that the popular explanat...

متن کامل

Policy Platforms, Campaign Spending and Voter Participation

We model electoral competition between two parties in a winner-take-all election. Parties choose strategically first their platforms and then their campaign spending under aggregate uncertainty about voters’ preferences. We use the model to examine why campaign spending in the United States has increased at the same time that politics has become more polarized. We find that the popular explanat...

متن کامل

تاثیر چرخه‌های انتخاباتی بر رشد هزینه‌های بهداشت عمومی کشورهای منتخب درحال توسعه و توسعه‌یافته (2010-1994)

  Parties and candidates in the election campaign try to raise the community to vote for them by offering a variety of social policies. However, the public health expenditures have been raised among the candidates as one of the most important tools to attract votes. Thus, this study uses panel data to investigate whether the components of electoral cycle have affected the growth of public healt...

متن کامل

The Role of Virtual News Networks on Voting Behavior (Case study: Political Science Students Islamic Azad University South Tehran Branch in 26 February 2016 Election)

Thepresent study aims to investigate the impact of the virtual news networks onpolitical participation of Iranians in parliamentary election on 26 February2016. The method of...

متن کامل

Adjustment of issue positions based on network strategies in an election campaign: A two-mode network autoregression model with cross-nested random effects

During election campaigns, political parties deliver statements on salient issues in the news media, which are called issue positions. This article conceptualizes issue positions as a valued and longitudinal two-mode network of parties by issues. The network is valued because parties pronounce pro or con positions on issues in more or less extreme ways. It is longitudinal because the media repo...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2005